So here’s an irony sammich. While the gender fraud that is Dylan Mulvaney has skated away from the flaming pile of poo that was his Bud Light gig…

“Anheuser-Busch is set to lay off nearly 400 workers at its corporate offices in the wake of slumping sales that accelerated on April 1, when Bud Light partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.” pic.twitter.com/fV9Ip9eLk8

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) July 27, 2023

…into an even more lucrative world of self-anointed, chatty victimhood…

Dylan Mulvaney is now a paid Women’s Empowerment Speaker.

Women, does this person empower you? https://t.co/F4hOloLXTX

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) July 27, 2023

…a British lesbian who took issue with a man – THAT man – modeling sports bras has been effectively backlisted from working.

A social worker has been blacklisted and referred to her regulatory body, after she questioned whether transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney was the right person to model Nike's sports bras — her manager said there was a risk she "might misgender someone".https://t.co/MielPGaH8m

— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) July 30, 2023

This poor woman, by virtue of an office discussion that began over gender neutral toilets, is being literally denied employment opportunities over fears she might “misgender” someone in the course of her duties if she got hired. For the safety of transgenders, binaries, and alphabet soup sex types all over England, they’re canceling her before any damage can be done.

Her being a lesbian doesn’t count, because she’s not the right kind of lesbian (I mean, look – her hair isn’t even died a weird color.).

A social worker with 25 years experience has been told she cannot apply for more work after she questioned whether transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney was the right person to model sports bras for Nike.

Mother of two Louise Chivers, 52, has been told she cannot apply for social services jobs pending an investigation after a manager at Leicestershire County Council suggested there was a risk she “might misgender someone”.

It came after she described Mulvaney, who identifies as female, as “a skinny gay man with no t-ts” and accused the TikTok influencer of being a “misogynist who mocks women” during a recent training day.

She has now been referred to Social Work England, the body that regulates social workers, and the company that recruited her has launched an investigation.

So far, I’m not seeing anything to argue with as far as her statements go. They’re ringing 100% true.

Ms Chivers also sounds as if she’s put up with a fair amount of required attempted indoctrination on the job. Kudos to her for not blowing a gasket all over someone. It seems to me, in the face of such repeated insanity, you’d want the person working for you who was able to remain calm and level headed.

…Ms Chivers added: “I do have to bite my tongue in a lot of these training sessions, I once attended an ‘Alphabet Soup’ session run by Cambridgeshire County Council when a member of staff expressed concerns about people misgendering dogs.

“It is getting ridiculous. None of this improves the social work we do. Like a lot of people, I’m fed up with this obsession about gender ideology and just want to get on with my job.”

Okay – I had to go look. Who and where are the lunatics of the Cambridgeshire County Council located?

Right away I recognized one name – Alconbury. Ebola had a B-17 game in the early 90s that used RAF Alconbury as the launch site for raids into Nazi Germany. Manly times. Wiki tells me the base is still active.

I’m not sure what’s happened to the locals. Their Twitter feed is chirpy enough. All the right things about gay marriage, holidays, dukes coming to pose at farms, hiking, and NetZero. Whoopie.

On their county website, they are actively recruiting for social workers like Ms Chivers. It doesn’t say anything about being the wrong kind of lesbian there. In fact, they’re all about DEI, inclusion, and learning from mistakes.

I guess some mistakes are less forgivable than others when they’re not “mistakes” to begin with.

It’s a “brilliant” place to live and a “brilliant” place to work and did we mention it was DIVERSE DIVERSE DIVERSE?

Well, it is.

Unless you’re the wrong kind of lesbian.

…Kate Barker of the LGB Alliance added: “It cannot be right that in workplaces around the country asserting that a woman is a female person is considered so offensive that it can lead to suspension or dismissal. Or that for lesbians, that ‘crime’ is compounded by their refusal to accept the absurd notion that a man can be a lesbian.

“It’s clear to us that the dystopian crackpottery of a small minority of ideologues continues to infect workplaces around the country. They’ve created a climate of fear that prevents sensible people from speaking out and punishes those, like Louise, who are brave enough to state an obvious truth.”

“Dystopian crackpottery” – now THAT is brilliant. And the “small minority of idealogues” who’ve infected workplaces and are giving leave to these crackpots to terrorize regular people are the same people the Cambridgeshire County Council has apparently sold their souls to. All in hopes of a good – for lack of a better term – social credit score.

The crackpots are formally known as “Stonewall.” They are a U.K. based advocacy group that keeps tabs on businesses, government bureaucracies, etc., worldwide, from what I can make of their website. They have links for “whistleblowers,” “safeguarding,” etc.

At Stonewall, we stand for lesbian, gay, bi, trans, queer, questioning and ace (LGBTQ+) people everywhere. We imagine a world where all LGBTQ+ people are free to be ourselves and can live our lives to the full.

Helpfully, they will also assess your business for its alphabet soup sex friendliness quotient and rate you. You deal with people or employ them, Stonewall wants their noses in your beeswax. Conversely, if you are woke af, you want a trendy Stonewall score to show off. If you Google “Stonewall ranking,” good grief – everyone from GQ to Citibank to universities are touting where they stand on this group’s “Top 100” list.

Ergo, this is where I believe the overwrought reaction to Ms. Chivers’ pretty benign truths came into friction with the Council’s score aspirations

Can’t have the wrong kind of lesbian spilling ugly facts all over that shiny, hard-fought-for number, could we?

There are so many currents running below the surface of this madness which explain why common sense can’t fight alone. These firms, these enablers, these institutions, and these activists are so intertwined and have so much invested in this deviant agenda that one little wrong-headed lesbian doesn’t stand a chance.

It’s going to take all of us standing and standing strong.

No quarter given.