Maybe old dogs can learn new tricks after all. Or maybe Nancy Pelosi finally shared some sage advice with Chuck Schumer about calling for votes on bills that can’t even get all of his own caucus together.

Either way, Schumer’s planned stunt votes on gun control have been postponed on account of math:

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) told colleagues on the Senate floor Wednesday that he will not immediately bring gun-control measures to the floor in the wake of two mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde, Texas, because he doesn’t expect them to muster enough Republican votes to pass.

Instead, the Democratic leader said he will wait for Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and other members of his caucus to try to negotiate a bipartisan compromise with Republicans on a measure that has a better chance of securing 60 votes to overcome a filibuster.

“There are some who want this body to quickly vote on sensible gun safety legislation, legislation supported by the vast majority of Americans,” he said. “They want to see this body vote quickly so the American people can know which side each senator is on …. I’m sympathetic to that, and I believe that accountability votes are important.”

But Schumer said he thought that bringing gun-control legislation in the immediate aftermath of Buffalo and Uvalde, where two lone shooters left a total of 31 people dead in the span of 10 days, would be fruitless because of staunch Republican opposition to such reforms.

Schumer was singing a different tune earlier, queuing up some quick floor votes on two long-moribund bills as a way to stick it to Republicans for midterm messaging. What happened? It appears that his own caucus thought better of exploiting the tragedy in Uvalde for cheap political point-scoring. Instead, a handful of them want more time to work across the aisle to see if Congress can actually pass something responsive to the issues at hand.

Kyrsten Sinema in particular seems skeptical that Schumer’s bills were the answer:

SINEMA just stopped reporters outside the senate chamber and said she had something to say. This is rare.

Here’s what she said. I asked her if she was willing to set aside the filibuster. She said she didn’t believe “that DC solutions are realistic here.” pic.twitter.com/BCUQQzEX0l

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) May 25, 2022

Sinema is gathered around the GOP leadership desk on the Senate floor. shes talking to thune, cotton, Rubio, Hoeven, Todd Young.

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) May 25, 2022

It’s not just Manchin and Sinema that want to take more time to mull over the options. Jon Tester said he’d vote to open debate on a bill to expand background checks, but only if Schumer could reach some sort of compromise that would pass:

Tester says he’d support Senate staying in session to pursue an agreement on background checks:

“Come on guys, kids got killed yesterday for Christ's sakes.

Let's talk about what can be done, not talk about what somebody wants, all right. Let's talk about what can be done!”

— Heather Caygle (@heatherscope) May 25, 2022

Manchin’s not happy with the House bill, though, and might not vote to open debate:

Jon Tester, who has had concerns about House universal background checks bill, told me he would vote YES to begin debate if Schumer set up a vote. Manchin told me he still has concerns with bill’s provisions to expand background checks to private transfers. Unsure how he’d vote

— Manu Raju (@mkraju) May 25, 2022

Just how would that have affected the Uvalde shooting? The perpetrator bought his weapons legally over the past week, as it turns out. And the report about body armor appears to have been erroneous as well:

The other rifle was with the shooter. On May 18, the suspect bought 375 rounds of 5.56 ammunition, according to the briefing. ATF paperwork shows he likely lived with his grandmother, where she was shot. Authorities say he was wearing a plate carrier with no ballistic armor.(2/3)

— Tony Plohetski (@tplohetski) May 25, 2022

With all of this ambiguity and lack of cohesion, Schumer apparently decided that it was better to wait than to conduct a stunt vote that might end up embarrassing him and his caucus. That’s certainly a novel strategy from Schumer in this session. There’s a first time for everything, it appears.

And there might not be a vote at all in this session:

🚨SCHUMER signals NO gun bill imminent

Americans can make a choice, Schumer says. “Americans can cast their vote in November” based on how people stand on guns.

SCHUMER says Republicans can work with Democrats now to craft a bill. He’s skeptical. “Unlikely, burnt in the past”

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) May 25, 2022

Needless to say, progressives who wanted Schumer to hold Republican feet to the fire are, um … not impressed.

This is the same @SenSchumer who promised a vote on background checks in March of 2021.

Now after 19 children have died he is making some bizarre political calculation that it's just not worth to debate or vote on this issue.

Absolutely pathetic and disgusting. https://t.co/fPsW8NhY1P

— igorvolsky (@igorvolsky) May 25, 2022

Schumer should resign. He's an okay administrator of the Senate and an excellent public speaker, but he's not a leader. I know what leadership looks like and this isn't it. We need leaders right now, in this moment. https://t.co/LD1GvKzM3s

— Brandon Friedman (@BFriedmanDC) May 25, 2022

Can Schumer resist pressure like this to avoid yet another extreme-policy vote that will torpedo endangered incumbents like Mark Kelly — who’s still veeeewwwwwwy qwwwiiiieeeetttt about any issue this year? Stay tuned!