Jill Biden's reminder that the more vaccines, the more COVID infections

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

Jill Biden has gotten COVID…again. I wish her a quick recovery.

This should come as no surprise. COVID is endemic. People will be getting COVID until the end of time, just like the flu or the common cold.

Advertisement

The only reason that it is notable, of course, is that Biden has been “vaccinated” multiple times (twice vaccinated, and at least twice boosted).

By now even the most zealous vaccine advocates have been forced to admit that the vaccines don’t actually do what they are supposed to do–prevent infection with or transmission of the virus.

Preventing infection and transmission of viruses has been the traditional purpose of vaccines–in fact, until recently it was the definition of a vaccine until the current mRNA “vaccines” came out and the CDC scrambled to redefine what a vaccine is. Until the COVID vaccine failed at its mission the CDC defined vaccination as “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

Well, obviously that didn’t apply to the COVID-19 vaccines, so they softened things to include “protecting” one from a disease. In this case, they are presumably relying on the belief that the current vaccines decrease the likelihood of the worst consequences of getting infected.

After he left the government Anthony Fauci himself published a paper that explained why COVID vaccines might reduce the incidence of severe systemic COVID-19 without actually preventing infection and transmission–I wrote about that here–and implicitly admitted that the likelihood of an injected vaccine preventing infection and transmission was pretty much zero. (This also, by the way, applies to the flu vaccine). It turns out that stopping respiratory viruses with injectable vaccines is nearly impossible, and Fauci knew this.

Advertisement

By now everybody is well aware that COVID-19 vaccines don’t work as originally advertised, but too few people know this: the very odd truth is that getting “vaccinated” actually makes you more likely to get reinfected with COVID, as has happened with Jill Biden, Joe Biden, Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, and just about every vaccine fanatic in the world.

It’s not just anecdotal evidence that suggests this. Confirmation bias would obviously lead the vaccine skeptical to note every incidence of a super-vaccinated person getting reinfected, so we should be skeptical of our own observations.

No, it turns out that there are studies that show this, most famously the huge Cleveland Clinic study that followed its own employees’ experience with COVID-19 vaccinations.

I wrote about that study back in January. The study demonstrated that the likelihood of getting infected by COVID-19 increased with the number of vaccinations.  The more vaccinations one has the higher the likelihood of getting infected with or reinfected with COVID-19.

In the discussion section of their study, the authors highlighted these results and addressed possible reasons for this relationship, and while not trashing vaccines per se they raised questions about the vaccination ad infinitum policies being pushed:

The evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 virus necessitates a more nuanced approach to assessing the potential impact of vaccination than when the original vaccines were developed. Additional factors beyond vaccine effectiveness need to be considered. The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the study start date, and which they had every opportunity to do. Therefore, those who received fewer than 3 doses (>45% of individuals in the study) were not those ineligible to receive the vaccine, but those who chose not to follow the CDC’s recommendations on remaining updated with COVID-19 vaccination, and one could reasonably expect these individuals to have been more likely to have exhibited higher risk-taking behavior. Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses. This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. Another study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7]. We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.

Advertisement

Indeed.

COVID “vaccine” defenders often point to the lower incidence of hospitalization and death found in vaccinated cohorts–although hospitalization and death from COVID are almost exclusively confined to a small and easily identified proportion of the population and not randomly distributed–suggesting that limiting vaccination to that cohort would be wise given that the vaccines have an extraordinarily high rate of adverse events (1 in 800, not 1 in millions).

On the other hand, we are being inundated with propaganda about the dangers of anybody getting “Long COVID” from any random infection. If you buy this argument then there is a strong case to be made AGAINST repeated vaccination due to the increased incidence of infection among the multiply vaccinated. If new infections increase the risk of Long COVID,” reducing the risk of infection through reducing vaccination makes sense.

Is Jill Biden a victim of vaccine-induced COVID? Who knows? COVID is, as I said, endemic. But we do know that multiple studies now show that the likelihood of reinfection skyrockets with each vaccination, so unless she has the risk factors for severe COVID it would seem wise to quit injecting her and others without a darn good reason.

Joe Biden, who is older and obviously more frail than she, probably fits into the high-risk category where a jab may be appropriate.

Relatively few of us are, though.

The authors of the Cleveland Clinic study tell us that “it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.” 

Advertisement

Unfortunately, nobody in a position of power is interested in making that examination. They wouldn’t like the answers they would get.

UPDATE: Whoopi Goldberg has COVID too!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Beege Welborn 5:00 PM | December 24, 2024
Advertisement
David Strom 1:50 PM | December 24, 2024
Advertisement