NBC Out–their LGBTQ+ propaganda arm, apparently–profiles a teacher and portrays her as a martyr for compassion and free speech.

They don’t tell you that the parents fighting her are trying to keep literal pornography and instructions on performing sexual activities such as joining sex apps, performing sexual acts, and eating literal sh!t for sexual pleasure away from their kids.

No, I am not making this up.

An Illinois middle school teacher says parents filed a police report against her after she displayed an LGBTQ-themed book in her class. https://t.co/GuzV536H31

— NBC Out (@NBCOUT) May 16, 2023

If your middle school teacher were pushing an agenda that invited kids into the paraphilic world of the alphabet people, you might file a police report too.

Sarah Bonner has been an Illinois middle school teacher for 20 years, and she has always tried to offer her students a diverse collection of books.

This year, a parent called the police over her book choice.

It started on Monday, March 13, 2023, when she held what she calls a “book tasting” for students.

“I wanted to give them a smattering of fiction and nonfiction to choose from on a day that we call “Reading Monday,'” Bonner, 42, told TODAY.com. “We just read and celebrate books.”

One of those books was Juno Dawson’s “This Book is Gay.” It’s a bestselling nonfiction book that’s billed by its publisher as an entertaining and informative “instruction manual” for anyone coming out as lesbian, gay, bisexual or trans.

That sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? We must be talking about Bible thumpers who think that anybody who is gay should be stoned, right?

Right?

Well, no. The controversy about This Book is Gay has been going on for a long time, and the alphabet people act like it is a modern update of To Kill a Mockingbird or Huck Finn.

It is not. And it is not appropriate for Middle School-age children, certainly not without parental consent.

This Book is Gay is not my cup of tea, I can tell you. But I wouldn’t want it banned from sale. If parents want to push this sort of thing onto their kids there is nothing I can do about it other than suggest that they wait until at least 16 years old. By then the kid has a strong sense of his sexuality and will probably be exploring it. That isn’t necessarily a good thing, but I would rather have a gay kid thinking about things through reading rather than just from his peers.

Kids in Middle School are generally between 11-14 years old. Pubescent, and probably at about peak idiot. I can assure you that, on average, a middle school kid is about as dumb as a chimpanzee, without the charm in many cases. Discussing scat play as a legitimate sexual practice is likely not a great idea, and talking about how fun it is to hook up through Grindr is an even worse one.

Well, maybe not WORSE, but also disgusting and dangerous.

Kids are impressionable and take a lot of cues from adults. This is, I am assured, something that is taught in schools of education. The choice of reading material is not neutral, benign, or insignificant. I can assure you that this teacher has a very very strong set of opinions that she is pushing on the kids–so strong, in fact, that she wrote a book on how to push gender ideology on kids.

Parents should have a right to object. And when she pushes back, they have a right to complain. A parent demanding that scat play, logging onto Grindr, and meeting “tricks” in secret not be pushed on their kids as viable modes of expressing their sexuality are, I would say, perfectly reasonable.

Anybody who says anything else is probably setting the kids up with those “tricks.” You do know what a “trick” is, right? From the Urban Dictionary:

Explaining how to find “tricks” on Grindr and set up meetings is not appropriate at any age, and is certainly not something a school teacher should be explaining to young kids.

Remember, this is for 11-14-year-old children. The teacher DOES belong in prison, not up for teacher of the year as NBC seems to suggest.

Bonner says that she understands parents “know their children best” and believes that both parents and educators have that “love and care” in common.

“The difference is that I have that love and care for all students, not just a singular student,” she adds. “In regards to the book that was challenged in my classroom, it was a message to the LGBTQ+ community in my room and in my district that they’re ‘less than.’”

You may have noticed that never, ever, ever does one of these MSM stories about “book banning” ever discuss what people are objecting to.

Because if they did people’s heads would explode. Instead, you get a narrative of brave, compassionate people fighting the evil book banners who want to kill gay people or something. This is absurd, and they know it. They are just trying to deceive you.

Explaining the ins and outs of sexual practices in a way that invites kids to explore the limits of their sexual curiosity has a certain appeal if you don’t think too hard. Kids at that age are becoming sexually aware and are very curious, and making them ashamed of their curiosity is not a wise move in the long run. Kids do need to know the risks and dangers of sexual promiscuity (even though during the pandemic the Canadian CDC suggested using GLORY HOLES as a safer form of sex!), and they need to know that sex is a natural desire and that their sexual desires are not inherently shameful.

Always remember Canada recomended GLORY HOLE as a safe way to do sex during the covid-19 pandemy. I love this country. pic.twitter.com/q2FDIPYuCk

— Tiago Cordeiro (@Tiagonotjames) December 20, 2021

Ironically, This Book is Gay is less “instructional” in many ways than some other alphabet books that are being pushed on kids, which are illustrated comic books with children performing sex acts. I suspect that if you went through the entire library of books that kids are being exposed to by this groomer you would find more than a few that are, at least graphically, more explicit.

Still, This Book is Gay is perhaps the widest-ranging in its promotion of various paraphilias that would scare the pants off parents. Any book that suggests that eating sh!t could be sexually appealing to an 11-year-old, or an 18-year-old even, doesn’t belong anywhere near a school.

I suspect that even Anthony Fauci might not approve of that.

I think most people assume that the books people are complaining about in schools merely have approving portrayals of gays and lesbians, and I am sure that if somebody complained about some alphabet book the teacher would just trot that out and everybody would laugh at how uptight the complaining parents are.

This is misdirection. A magic trick.

You would be shocked at the propaganda and instruction manuals that are being put into the hands of children. Not teens even, but children.

The so-called “Don’t Say Gay” controversy was about books being pushed to K-3. That is 5 years old to 8 years old.

The alphabet people are coming for kids, and when a book like This Book is Gay is suggesting that Grindr would be interesting to 11-year-old children you know that the people pushing this ideology are profoundly sick. They are, literally, grooming children.

Children should not be looking for “tricks.” If we can’t agree on that, there is no point even talking.